| Home | Participants | Calendar | Education |
| Experiment | Publications | Released Data |
Antarctic Bidirectional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) PaperA PDF reprint of the BRDF paper is available here: HudsonEtAl2006.pdf. The definitive version of the paper is on the AGU Journals' website. All materials © Copyright 2006 American Geophysical Union. Supplemental materials are availble here. |
| Figures (see paper for full captions; fig=Matlab figure, eps=Encapsulated Postscript, pdf=Portable Document Format) |
| Figure 1 | Definition of angles used in paper | fig | eps | |
| Figure 2 | A photograph of the Dome C snow surface | eps | ||
| Figure 3 | Example plots of the anisotropic reflectance factor (R) measurements | eps | ||
| Figure 4 | Two more examples of R, at 2000 nm, where snow is very dark | eps | ||
| Figure 5 | Plot of R at the forward peak (Rf) versus wavelength | fig | eps | |
| Figure 6 | Spectral albedo of Dome C snow with diffuse incident light | fig | eps | |
| Figure 7 | Rf versus albedo | fig | eps | |
| Figure 8 | Rf versus solar zenith angle | fig | eps | |
| Figure 9 | First and second EOF for parameterization A | eps | ||
| Figure 10 | Example of parameterized coefficients for calculating R | eps | ||
| Figure 11 | Some plots showing the results of the parameterizations | eps | ||
| Figure 12 | Some plots showing the relative error of the parameterizations | eps | ||
| Figure 13 | A comparison of R at South Pole and Dome C | eps | ||
| Figure 14 | A comparison between observed R and that modeled for a flat surface | eps | ||
| Figure 15 | A comparison between the observed R(375 nm) and that calculated for 375 nm using R(900 nm) | eps |
| Home | Participants | Calendar | Education |
| Experiment | Publications | Released Data |